PH raised this question a while back. I still don’t have the definitive answer but think that Suzanne probably wasn’t the daughter of an European-native union because of the conventions I see used in the documents surrounding her birth.
During the 1650s when Suzanne was born, the Jesuits operated a native reserve at Sillery. The reserve bordered the St. Lawrence River and consisted of a stone fort that surrounded the Jesuit residences, their oven, their brewery, and their chapel — and the Terres des Sauvages where Christian Indians lived. Behind the native lands, the Ursaline nuns ran a school and medical clinic. In the 1650s, Europeans were given permission to settle to the west of the mission as a buffer against Iroquois attack. Suzanne’s father, Jean Nepveu acquired his land there in November 1652.
Sillery was definitely a crossroads of European and native life in the 1650s. Father Bailloquet, of the thickly-inked, tight scrawl below, baptized many natives at Sillery. At least 8 baptisms are captured in the screen shot below.
In the Sillery records, the native and the European births were usually kept separate. However, Suzanne Nepveu’s baptism record defies expectations because it is in an unusual mixed list. Still, the way her baptism was handled makes it likely that she was European in origin.
In the list above, both European and native baptisms are present — but the European baptisms (Suzanne Neveu, Hyancith Charland, Margarita Guillebout, and Ignace Denis) all have their names listed in the margins. The native child is not extended that courtesy — just as in the native-only baptism list above.
Suzanne’s older sister, Barbe, was baptized at Notre Dame de Quebec a couple of years prior.
She was also granted margin recognition for her record.
Understanding these documents isn’t easy. The handwriting is often poor, the documents are often in Latin, and the information is utilitarian. For now, I am confidant in my hunch about margin recognition as a signal of pure European heritage. However if I had a Meti (mixed race) baptism record (or few) for comparison, I might be inspired to change my mind. If you have one from the 1650s, please share!